As far as I understand there's a more profound difference, see
http://stackoverflow.com/a/14295488/357732.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 8:23 PM Brandon Allbery
The operational package is just a free monad with some canned conveniences. If what it provides is sufficient for your use case, there's no reason to switch; but if they don't fit your use case, you can use one of the other embellished free monads (e.g. MonadPrompt) or start from a bare free monad and write what you need.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Michael Litchard < litchard.michael@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm studying the code for a blackjack game: See marked answer. http://codereview.stackexchange.com/questions/46809/blackjack-in-haskell
It uses the operational package, and mentions one could write equivalent code using a free monad. But my question is, for this use case is there any benefit for using a free monad?
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to: http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.
-- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to: http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.