
12 Apr
2007
12 Apr
'07
12:24 a.m.
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 09:20:12PM -0700, Tim Chevalier wrote:
On 4/11/07, Stefan O'Rear
wrote: If you want to be really explicit about it, here is a sort that will work:
sort [] = [] sort l@(x:_) = filter (
x) l (A stable quicksort, btw)
You may be missing a few recursive calls there :-)
Indeed. Stefan