Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: mathematical notation and functional programming

Stefan Monnier writes:

OTOH I like the a

It's unambiguous even if the return value of < can be passed as an argument to <. Operators are usually left-associative, right-associative or non-associative. A non-associative operator can have an additional semantics defined when it's used multiple times, just like a,b,c in OCaml is neither a,(b,c) nor (a,b),c, or even a*b*c as a type. -- __("< Marcin Kowalczyk \__/ qrczak@knm.org.pl ^^ http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/