
16 Apr
2009
16 Apr
'09
3:04 a.m.
Robin Green wrote:
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:31:50 -0700 Michael Mossey
wrote: I was thinking that it might be useful to have a Google-like "do you mean this?" feature. If the field name is //customer=, then the parser might recognize a huge list of variants like //ustomer=, //customor=, etc...
You could reduce the probability of such errors by providing a standard template that could be copy-pasted in wherever necessary.
Yes, that will be there. My example is not so good because it seems concerned with the keywords only. I'm more concerned about errors in the data they enter... for example, names of people and references to document names. Thanks, Mike