[Haskell-cafe] don't: a 'do' for comonads?

As seen on #haskell, from an idea by Malcolm, 14:42 ?let top'n'tail = ("<pre>"++) . (++"</pre>") 14:42 lambdabot> Defined. 14:43 dons> > L.top'n'tail "foo me now" 14:43 lambdabot> "<pre>foo me now</pre>" 14:43 mauke> that reminds me, haskell needs don't 14:43 dons> yes! 14:44 pkhuong-> mm. the opposite of do, eh? do for comonads? :) So now a prize to the person who comes up with the best use for the identifier: don't :: ? -- Don