On 2008 Sep 30, at 17:59, Derek Elkins wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 13:20 -0700, Don Stewart wrote:
noteed:
I'd like to know, now that time got by a bit, what the writers of the X monad think about the use of the ReaderT/WriterT/IO brought to them (to isolate Configuration data and dynamic data and glue them together with IO). Are you happy of it, did it make things easier or not, would you do it again ?
It made the structuring and invariants between runtime data, and configuration data clean and precise. Yes, A+++ would buy again.
xmonad is a little too alive to be doing postmortems yet
I was wondering what he knew that the rest of us didn't.... -- brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] allbery@kf8nh.com system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH