On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Roman Cheplyaka
It's useful to mention the limitations of this package, so that people know what to expect and don't spend their time testing it to understand that it doesn't suit their needs.
Good point, I'll put the limitations and TODO stuff into the package description.
For example: doesn't generate tags for definitions without type signatures
That was a conscious decision, though now that I think about it I could assume they're unexported and use vim's static tags for those definitions. I don't know about the most common case, but I almost always have signatures on top level definitions, and I don't really feel like I need tags for where or let-bound definitions.
doesn't understand common extensions, such as type families
Oops, that was an oversight. Should be easy enough to fix.