
19 Aug
2008
19 Aug
'08
8:45 a.m.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Bas van Dijk
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Johan Tibell
wrote: I might have to run the action twice to avoid extra measuring overhead.
I don't think it matters because the extra measuring overhead is constant over the measuring iterations.
I want the reported times to differ as little as possible from the actual running times. Any constant overhead skews the results upwards. It might matter is the action being benchmark has a very low run time. Maybe I misunderstood what you said. -- Johan