
Book seems to use a quicksort (in package type-level-sets) to avoid
duplicates. A couple years ago I did a benchmark
http://code.haskell.org/~aavogt/HList-nodup/Run.html that includes a
different quicksort. It is a good method, but maybe type-level-sets has a
better implementation. Provided my timings generalize, I think dealing with
many records of 50 elements will be frustrating.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Dmitry Olshansky
This is really interesting. But how many fields in Book could be? I'm afraid there could be a problem for time and memory consumption by compiler. Isn't it?
Best regards, Dmitry
2016-08-24 22:39 GMT+03:00 Julian Arni
: I was playing around with GHC 8 yesterday, and ended up writing another extensible records library:
https://hackage.haskell.org/package/bookkeeper
And a blog post about it:
https://turingjump.com/blog/bookkeeper/
I hope someone finds this useful!
-- Julian K. Arni Haskell Consultant, Turing Jump https://turingjump.com
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to: http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to: http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.