
Perhaps the rumours refer to non-tagged "versions"? In conventional non-distributed version control systems, one might go back to the version on a specific date, while with darcs, that only makes sense wrt a specific repo (I think?). So you can unpull all patches after a date from your local repo, but that doesn't mean that you get a repo that matches someone else's repo after they perform the same procedure. If both parties commit to a central repo, and pull all changes via that, there is a greater chance of date-based synchronicity. Claus
Yes. It would be fairly easy to check this in the docs, too :)
bugfact:
Okay, thanks. So the rumors about this must be incorrect?
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:57 PM, Ketil Malde
wrote: Don Stewart
writes: >> Rumor goes that this is very difficult to do with Darcs. Is this correct?
> darcs unpull
Or just cd to a different directory, and darcs get -t <version you want>?
-k -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe