3 Mar
2009
3 Mar
'09
5:10 a.m.
Manlio Perillo ha scritto:
[...]
The other program, with a lot of array concatenations, still eats a lot of memory...
Concatenating arrays generally copies data. Which uses memory.
Of course, but why the garbage collector does not "release" this temporary used memory? Note that I'm using the -F1 flag with the RST.
Maybe it is a problem with IntMap, when there are a lot of keys?
It *is* a problem with IntMap. I have changed the program to not use any array concatenation, and it still requires a lot of memory. Does esist a data structure that is able to store something like 480189 keys with efficient memory usage? Thanks Manlio Perillo