2 May
2008
2 May
'08
1:48 p.m.
2008/5/2 Simon Marlow
David Waern wrote:
No it doesn't, but it's on the TODO list. It needs a fix in GHC.
By the way, I'm going to experiment with doing the parsing of comments on the Haddock side instead of in GHC. If that works out, we won't have to fix these things in GHC anymore.
Sounds great - along the lines that we discussed on cvs-ghc a while back?
Yes, something along the lines of separately parsing the comments and recording their source locations, and then trying to match them with the source locations of the AST nodes. I don't think there are any lexical rules for where Haddock comments can exist, so it should work. David