[Haskell-cafe] Re: nested maybes

Udo Stenzel wrote:

Sure, you're right, everything flowing in the same direction is usually nicer, and in central Europe, that order is from the left to the right. What a shame that the Haskell gods chose to give the arguments to (.) and ($) the wrong order!

But then application is in the wrong order, too. Do you really want to write (x f) for f applied to x? Ben