
14 Jul
2006
14 Jul
'06
10:07 a.m.
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 02:28:20PM +0100, David House wrote:
On 14/07/06, David Roundy
wrote: Anyhow, just thought I'd mention that this isn't useful only for "ordinary" cyclic objects like dates.
Correct. Which is why Chris Kuklewicz included instances for, e.g., Int :)
Ah, that's what I get for just skimming the thread! :)
I think this would be a great class to have in the standard libs. It would be even better if we could derive it.
I agree, it sounds very nice (although I've obviously not even looked at the implementation). -- David Roundy