Re: [Haskell-cafe] Some thoughts on Type-Directed Name Resolution

I'm proposing my record fields so that selectors are just functions. Then it's independent of dot notation. (It's the semantics I'm far more concerned with.)

Folks, I've put my 'Record in Haskell' proposal on the wiki http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Records as suggestion 5 Declared Overloaded Record Fields. Thanks to the voiciferousness on this thread, dot notation is completely optional. Feedback welcome. AntC -- View this message in context: http://haskell.1045720.n5.nabble.com/Some-thoughts-on-Type-Directed-Name-Res... Sent from the Haskell - Haskell-Cafe mailing list archive at Nabble.com.