
5 Apr
2016
5 Apr
'16
3:13 p.m.
Isn't http://hackage.haskell.org/package/protocol-buffers doing the same thing with records?
They're quite similar, however protobuf-simple uses Data.Text instead of Data.ByteString for strings. Furthermore it generates newtypes instead of data types for messages with only one field. Kind regards, Martijn Rijkeboer