Re: [Haskell-cafe] vector to uvector and back again

bos:

I'm thinking of switching the statistics library over to using vector. uvector is pretty bit-rotted in comparison to vector at this point, and it's really seeing no development, while vector is The Shiny Future. Roman, would you call the vector library good enough to use in production at the moment?

uvector's not seeing much development, but at least in the last round of benchmarks it was still consistently faster -- since it's been micro-optimized. Also, we have uvector-algorithms, so you can sort etc. a uvector. I'm not sure its the long term solution, but its a simpler, faster lib at the moment, with more surrounding support, users and documentation. -- Don