On 20050507T120430-0400, Daniel Carrera wrote:
I think it's because there's no real reason for someone to think that the words "list" and "array" might not be synonims. I certainly don't seen a linguistic distinction. Either term refers to an ordered collection of items.
I don't even know what "array" means outside of programming (but then again, English is not my native language). However... It is dangerous for anyone to infer the meaning of a technical term based on the common meaning of the word. The common meaning usually helps in *remembering* the technical meaning, but that comes *after* finding out what the technical meaning is. This applies in any technology or science, not just Haskell programming or programming in general.
Suppose that you learn a new computer language, and it happens to assign special meanings to the words "collection" and "group".
Those terms have a lot of meanings in technical jargon.
You don't know this. So you start talking about groups as you do in every day English and people tell you that you're mixing up concepts.
Your mistake is the "start talking about groups as you do in every day English" part.
I guess that a more likely example in programming would be a language that differentiates between "functions", "procedures" and "subroutines".
Well, most languages use "function" contrary to the everyday meaning of the word. Even "functional" in "functional programming" does not mean what you'd think it means. (Anybody else heard people shout "But C *is* a functional language!"? - And I'm not talking about geeks who use the FP style in C:) -- Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho http://antti-juhani.kaijanaho.info/ Blogi - http://kaijanaho.info/antti-juhani/blog/ Toys - http://www.cc.jyu.fi/yhd/toys/