It's a matter of taste. I prefer the function composition in this case.
It reads nicely as a pipeline.
-- Lennart
On Fri, Feb 1, 2008 at 9:48 PM, Dan Licata
Not to start a flame war or religious debate, but I don't think that eta-expansions should be considered bad style. I realize that composition-style is good for certain types of reasoning, but fully eta-expanded code has an important legibility advantage: you can tell the shape of its type just by looking at it! Personally, I'd rather read the original version.
-Dan
On Feb01, Derek Elkins wrote:
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 00:09 -0500, Cale Gibbard wrote:
Hello,
Today on #haskell, resiak was asking about a clean way to write the function which allocates an array of CStrings using withCString and withArray0 to produce a new with* style function. I came up with the following:
nest :: [(r -> a) -> a] -> ([r] -> a) -> a nest xs = runCont (sequence (map Cont xs))
This is what you write after all that time on #haskell?
nest = runCont . sequence . map Cont
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe