On 8 June 2015 at 13:23, aditya siram
How would people feel about Haddock alphabetizing record accessors by default?
For example: data T { b :: ..., c :: ... , a :: ... } displays as: data T { a :: ..., b :: ... , c :: ... }
Seems as though projects that have large records like Cabal & Parsec would benefit from this.
In some (many?) cases, there is a logical ordering to the values. Considering my own code, the records in GraphvizParams here matches the ordering that they're used/found in the resultant Dot graph: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/graphviz-2999.17.0.2/docs/Data-GraphViz.h...
Thanks! -deech
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
-- Ivan Lazar Miljenovic Ivan.Miljenovic@gmail.com http://IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com