6 May
2010
6 May
'10
4:57 a.m.
Henning Thielemann
I meant it the other way round: Given that package X-a.b.c.d does not compile due to dependencies that turn out to be too restricted, then I could relax the dependency version bounds in X.cabal. If I also increase X's version to a.b.c.d+1, then cabal-install should be happy.
Yes, that should suffice. You'll have to build that patched version yourself though. Note that a better way of doing it is to change the version to "a.b.c.d.1", in case upstream releases an "a.b.c.d+1" version. -- Ivan Lazar Miljenovic Ivan.Miljenovic@gmail.com IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com