
4 Jun
2009
4 Jun
'09
1:26 a.m.
Yeah, in a way similar to ArrowPlus/ArrowZero. Then again, I'm not
sure whether it would be meaningful to split up MonadPlus like that.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:40 AM, Antoine Latter
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Daniel Peebles
wrote: It seems like if we could get fail out of Monad and into something like MonadFail/Zero, then it might make sense to make a lookup that returned an instance of that instead?
Dan
Do you mean splitting up MonadPlus/Alternative into two classes? Or we could just return in MonadPlus/Alternative.
Antoine