16 Oct
2010
16 Oct
'10
11:42 a.m.
Ben Franksen wrote:
> That cutting edge research is done for Haskell as well as for its > implementations is of course good to know, but just stating it is > not nearly enough: such a statement must be corroberated with > evidence, otherwise it is just idle marketing. (Not that there > wouldn't be evidence amass, it's just that none is given.)
You literally want evidence that research played a part in Haskell, in its opening statement? Why??
I reject this objection.
Oops, translation error. I wanted to say: I withdraw this objection. Cheers Ben