
21 Aug
2007
21 Aug
'07
4:43 p.m.
Andrew Coppin wrote:
...does this mean Haskell is officially harder to understand than Lisp, Java, Perl and O'Caml? :-}
(OTOH, does this mean Haskell is easier to understand than PHP or C++?)
Or, Haskell is the easiest to understand of them all. Reason: Extremely large channel means so hard to understand that many people want help. Extremely small channel means so hard to understand that few people show interest. The middle-sized channel sits at the sweet spot.