
2 Apr
2014
2 Apr
'14
3:32 p.m.
I stand corrected. So they were there all along and then finally briefly
had a reason to exist later on. ;)
-Edward
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Dan Doel
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Edward Kmett
wrote: This is where the data type contexts came from. They were originally motivated by the needs of the no-longer existent Seq class, and then subverted to make Complex less useful than it otherwise could be. ;)
This is wrong. Data type contexts existed in the Haskell 1.0 report, and Ratio and Complex used them there. Strict fields didn't exist until 1.3.
-- Dan