Re: [Haskell-cafe] short licensing question

Svein Ove Aas wrote:

In this case, LGPL is a problem. It requires you to offer a way to re-link such binaries against new versions/implementations of the library, which in practice requires it to be either open source or dynamically linked.

Don't understand that. Can't we just put a constraint: "our binary works only with versions x.x.x-y.y.y of this LGPL licensed library"? The Cabal provides a way to put such constraint in build-depends... Andrey -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/short-licensing-question-tp27110059p27114282.html Sent from the Haskell - Haskell-Cafe mailing list archive at Nabble.com.