
On Feb 28, 2021, at 3:25 AM, Ben Franksen
wrote: What are these other GHC features? Does the paper explain this? Otherwise where can I read more about it?
I think it was data families. But, perhaps more troublesome is the fact that the paper assumes a dependently-typed internal language. Maybe it's possible to do this without dependent types in the internal language, but I'm not sure how to begin to think about that problem. I was about to write that it might be helpful to have a GHC proposal to implement this paper, which would depend on (and provide further motivation for) having dependent types... but I'm not actually sure that would be productive at this point. I have spent some time thinking about how to clear my decks to make more time for implementation work, and I expect to prioritize this more going forward. Richard