After reading your message I found "Why Attribute Grammars
Matter" and a few other introductions, and it seems attribute
grammars are exactly what I'm trying to do. Do you know of
some place (mailing list etc.) where I can discuss attribute
grammars or ask for suggestions on design?
Thanks,
Maurício
2010/10/7, bieniusa
It's not entirely clear what you mean:
Do you want to describe grammars or parsers functionally:
In the first case, parser combinators are what you want (or some encoding of them). There are many variations on these: LL(k), context-free, dependent. Cyclicity (of what kind?) or empty productions are not necessarily a problem.
If you already parsed the input to an abstract syntax tree, and want to act on this input in terms of your grammar, then attribute grammars are what you are looking for.
- Arie
Am 06.10.2010 17:43, schrieb Maurício CA:
Hi, all,
I've been working in a tool that reads a grammar with associated actions and act on input based on that grammar. I would like to rewrite it in a functional style, but I've not been able to find a theory that would handle any possible grammar with cyclicity and empty productions, and flexibility is more important for this tool than performance.
Do you have a suggestion on that? What I'm using now is this (non-functional) article on Earley method:
http://www.springerlink.com/content/602270808666074p
Thanks,
Maurício
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe