Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Rewriting a famous library and using the same name: pros and cons

Stephen Tetley writes:

I think it was Hugs compliant as least for some revisions - I seem to remember looking at it before I switched to GHC.

People still use Hugs? :p A bit more seriously: is there any listing anywhere of which extensions Hugs supports? Definitely serious: if anything, I would care more about ensuring compatability with JHC, UHC, etc. than Hugs nowadays. -- Ivan Lazar Miljenovic Ivan.Miljenovic@gmail.com IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com