On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 16:51 +0300, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello David,
Hello Bulat,
Tuesday, November 25, 2008, 4:45:28 PM, you wrote:
However, I am getting very poor performance due to the GC copying 6G in each run. The only explanation that I can think of is that it is copying my giant array.
each GC run? each program run?
each program run
try to increase size of your array and check how many data are now copied by GC (of course, everything else shouldn't be changed)
Excellent idea. I made the array twice as big, Otherwise everything else is the same. The GC copies the same amount of data. The only difference I noticed is that with the array twice as big, there were about half as many collections in generation 1. The time and efficiency are about the same. I guess it is not the fault of Data.Array.Storable. When I was researching how to do this, I was really hoping for something like "static areas" from the Lisp Machine operating system. You could allocate any normal object in an area of the heap where the GC would not bother with it. I miss that. I wonder why GHC doesn't have such a concept?