19 Jan
2008
19 Jan
'08
2:57 p.m.
Ben Franksen wrote:
Kalman Noel wrote:
Ben Franksen wrote:
Kalman Noel wrote:
(2) means that the sequence does not converge, because you can always find a value that is /larger/ than what you hoped might be the limit.
Your definition of (2) is usually termed as '(a_n) contains a subsequence that tends toward +infinity'. I'll show (2) <=> (2'), where
(2'): (a_n) contains a subsequence that tends toward +infinity
Only now did I understand that your point was to explain why and how my definition (2) is incorrect. It's clear to me now. Kalman ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finally - A spam blocker that actually works. http://www.bluebottle.com/tag/4