
Blocking/unsubscribing people based on their email provider seems... sort of
impolite or unwelcoming.
A greylist could work.
Given the relatively low volume of spam, my vote is for the original
suggestion of first-message-moderated, with the ability to put an address
back on moderation if their account is hacked.
Tom / amindfv
On Oct 23, 2011 11:09 PM, "Conrad Parker"
On 24 October 2011 10:57, Daniel Fischer
wrote: On Monday 24 October 2011, 03:54:09, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
R J wrote:
hey Haskell this is nuts http://www.business10i.com hey Haskell this is nuts xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx
Maybe its time to moderate all newcomers to this list, at least until they post one non-spam message to the list.
Just for the record, not a newcomer, and has non-spam messages, e.g.
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2010-May/077871.html http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2010-May/078054.html
There was a recent hotmail exploit, with people reporting their account sent spam, see eg:
https://plus.google.com/117020778736538274606/posts/4yMP7iDshCf
I'd be in favor of graylisting or unsubscribing anyone who uses hotmail.
Conrad.
If you need volunteers to do this moderation I'll stick my hand up.
Erik
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe