Hello, I think you have to remember that is x in
f x = 2 * x + 1 is just a name for the parameter and not the parameter itself.
g (_:xs) = xs (_:xs) is something similar as a name. You might say '(_:xs)' stands for the
g y@(_:xs) = xs you might probably say "y is the parameter of g" - but y is just a name for
If you look at parameter (you can't say it is the name of the parameter...). And xs is just the name of the part of the parameter. In the case of that parameter. There is a difference between names, entities and bindings. Can be confusing if you take a look at this quote: “The name of the song is called ‘Haddocks’ Eyes’.”
“Oh, that’s the name of the song, is it?” Alice said, trying to feel interested. “No, you don’t understand,” the Knight said, looking a little vexed. “That’s what the name is called. The name really is ‘The Aged Aged Man’.” “Then I ought to have said ‘That’s what the song is called’?” Alice corrected herself. “No, you oughtn’t: that’s quite another thing! The song is called ‘Ways and Means’; but that’s only what it’s called, you know!” “Well, what is the song, then?” said Alice, who was by this time completely bewildered. “I was coming to that,” the Knight said. “The song really is ‘A-sitting On A Gate’; and the tune’s my own invention.” L. Caroll, Through the Looking Glass
2011/10/1 José Romildo Malaquias
Hello.
When studing programming languages I have learned that parameter is a variable (name) that appears in a function definition and denotes the value to which the function is applied when the function is called.
Argument is the value to which the function is applied.
The parameter allows the manipulation of the argument in the body of the funtion definition in order to produce the result.
Now I am not sure how to apply these concepts to Haskell, as Haskell uses pattern matching to deal with argument passing to functions.
For instance, in the definition
f x = 2 * x + 1
x is a parameter, and in the application
f 34
34 is an argument.
But in the definition
g (_:xs) = xs
what is the parameter of the function g? Is it the pattern (_:xs)? If so then a parameter is not necessarily a variable anymore, and that seems very strange. And what is xs? Is it a parameter, although it does not denote the value to which the function is aplied, but just part of it?
I am writing some slides to use in my functional programming classes, but I am not sure how to deal with these terms.
Any comments?
Romildo -- DECOM - ICEB - UFOP
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe