В сообщении от 30 сентября 2009 23:42:57 Casey Hawthorne написал:
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:24:11 +0200, you wrote:
I?m a physicist, so I think they would be attracted by something like
Haskell: high level physics modelling at Fortran speeds
Haskell: mathematics beyond numerical calculus
And, easier to make use of multi-core machines than threaded Fortran.
Yes this is good selling point. Fortran (and C++ too) programs heavily rely on global state. And thus are very difficult to parallelize. Frequently only possibility is process-level parallelism. This however has problems too.
I suppose one could have a Haskell parser convert Fortran to monadal code.
Then, a parser to convert, hopefully, most of the resulting code to pure code.
This is interesting but very challenging task. Conversion fortran-> monadic code is trade of one mess for another. Since local state and global state are ubiquitous it's difficult to factor out pure functions. Another problem is that fortran functions are usually BIG. Most likely this will require manual intervention.