Koen Claessen koen@cs.chalmers.se wrote:
Cagdas Ozgenc wondered:
| Is there a reason why partial application cannot be | applied in arbitrary order? Was it a technical | difficulty in the design of Haskell? Or is it just | following beta reduction rigorously?
Alastair David Reid answered:
| Haskell doesn't dictate any particular evaluation | order. If you look at the name of the Haskell report, | it calls Haskell a "non-strict" language not a "lazy" | language.
Somehow I do not think that Cagdas was talking about evaluation order at all. I think he referred to the following: Suppose I have a function f which is defined to have 3 arguments:
Partial application on any subset of arguments regardless of their order has been implemented in the FXSL functional programming library and is described here: http://www.topxml.com/xsl/articles/df/ Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage http://sports.yahoo.com/