Yes, the spec is almost a direct translation from Rack.
For middleware, I translated some from Rack, but it does not have to
be a port. I'm just lazy.
Rack borrowed some basic middleware from WSGI too, like Lint.
About the style, it's a bit weird, yes. But only in module scope ;)
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Sebastiaan Visser
What kind of port is this? Direct translation from ruby source?
I see that you are using the (.) for OO-style reversed function application. Which feels a bit weird at first sight.
Snippet from your Hack.Handler.Kibro:
handle app = do env <- get_env response <- app env .liftIO
-- set response response.headers.mapM_ (splash setHeader) response.status.show.setHeader "Status" response.body.output
On Apr 25, 2009, at 7:58 AM, Jinjing Wang wrote:
Hia,
A few interesting progress on Hack:
* many middleware ported from Rack, including a lambda! ( just like a pony for wsgi, and a lobster for rack ) * 2 handlers, one for Kibro on fcgi / lighttpd, one for Hyena web server * apps are portable, Bamboo is a port of Panda that runs on Hack, works fine with both handlers * Hyena handler is still experimental
A lambda app looks like this
-- Main.hs source
module Main where
import Hack import Hack.Utils
import Hack.Handler.Hyena import Hack.Contrib.Lambda
main = run $ lambda dummy_app
-- compile
ghc --make -O2 Main.hs
-- run ./Main
now go to http://localhost:3000/lambda
Cheers,
Links:
* [Hack] (http://github.com/nfjinjing/hack/tree/master) * [Bamboo] (http://github.com/nfjinjing/bamboo/tree/master)
-- jinjing