Andrew Coppin
I'm trying to voice the opinion that there is such a thing as too many libraries. The article I linked to explains part of why this is the case, in a better way than I've been able to phrase it myself.
I don't think so, the article seems to talk more about social problems among lisp users, which it - at least in part - ascribes to the technical prowess of the language. I don't think the article makes its point very well, though. For instance, it uses object orientation as an example, but CLOS is fairly standard in Lisp, I believe, and the author had to turn to Scheme for his examples. The problem again seems to be more social (the lack of an active committee to do standardizing) than technical.
The opinion that having too many libraries can be a problem, which some people don't seem to agree with.
I don't see how the number of available libraries is a problem in itself, but it would be nice if hackage or some other resource provided more help in recommending which library to try first. We do have standardization efforts, committees bringing the language forward and an inclusive and collaborative community. -k -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants