On Saturday 08 July 2006 12:25 pm, David Roundy wrote:
Hi all,
I'm wanting to create a data structure to hold a directed acyclic graph (which will have patches represented by edges), and haven't yet been able to figure out a nice representation. I'd like one that can be reasoned with recursively, or as closely to recursively as possible. The problem is one of dependency relations between darcs patches, and "normally" reduces to a simple tree, with conflict resolution patches bringing branches of the tree back together. Trees I know how to handle intuitively and elegantly, but DAGs are a whole different question.
I looked for papers, and there was one on "an initial-algebra approach to DAGs" that looked promising, but I'm afraid I wasn't able to fully understand it, and it is able to describe more complicated DAGs than I'd like to support.
Anyhow, any suggestions from persons with experience with this sort of thing would be great. These are getting to be data structures that are more complicated than anything I'm comfortable with. :(
Is there some reason you don't want to use FGL? http://web.engr.oregonstate.edu/~erwig/fgl/haskell/ http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/fgl/Data-Graph-Inductive.h... -- Rob Dockins Talk softly and drive a Sherman tank. Laugh hard, it's a long way to the bank. -- TMBG