27 Jun
2013
27 Jun
'13
11:05 p.m.
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
B B wrote:
1) Is the LLVM Backend actively developed or should I be afraid it will be discontinued or broken?
My understanding is that it is being actively developed. Currently for numerical code, the LLVM backend performs better than the native codegen. I also think that the LLVM backend is the only option for ARM.
And there was a lareg set of patches for the LLVM backend applied just now: http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-commits/2013-June/002324.html and the following 10 or so commit. Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/