
On 17 Dec 2008, at 09:26, Luke Palmer wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 1:10 AM, Thomas Davie
wrote: On 16 Dec 2008, at 18:40, Darrin Thompson wrote:
---- ---- \ \ \ \ ------------ \ \ \ \ \ | \ \ \ \ ----------- \ \ \ \ / / / \ -------- / / / \ \ | / / / /\ \ ------- / / / / \ \ ---- ---- ----
Oh please no, please don't let the logo be something that says "Haskell, it's all about monads".
But it's a very pretty logo. And the idea of "computation abstractions", Applicatives and Monads in particular, are a pretty big part of Haskell as a language and as a culture. Haskell, it's not exactly not about monads.
No, I agree, but there's already a large body of literature that implies that Haskell is pretty much only about monads, and I'd hate to see the logo go the same way. Though I do take your point about abstractions being a major part of the language. Bob