23 May
2012
23 May
'12
6:33 a.m.
On 23/05/2012 11:22, Andres Löh wrote:
I've not looked at the .tix file, but a few tests seem to confirm what I'd suspect. For derived instances, you have to cover *all* methods, otherwise the type class will be shown as not covered.
Ok, I see. It's going to take me a while to cover all instances of this!
For the datatype, your use of field labels causes GHC to generate accessor functions. These aren't covered by your tests. Therefore the datatype shows as not completely covered.
Ah, yes, that makes sense. Thanks, David -- David Turner Senior Consultant Tracsis PLC Tracsis PLC is a company registered in England and Wales with number 5019106.