9 May
                
                    2008
                
            
            
                9 May
                
                '08
                
            
            
            
        
    
                10:31 a.m.
            
        Andrew Coppin wrote:
The function (++) :: [x] -> [x] -> [x] has O(n) complexity.
If somebody were to invent some type that looks like [x] but actually uses some sort of tree rather than a linked list, you should be able to get O(1) concatenation. Has anybody ever implemented such a thing?
See also Data.Sequence, which is not O(1) append, but it is O(log something), and also O(1) cons and snoc and has lots of other nice complexities including fast update of a single cell. Jules