4 Apr
2011
4 Apr
'11
5:26 a.m.
Hi Jason Good luck - I worked on a binding a couple of years ago, but decided that FreeType is really a framework rather than a library. Thus, I felt it would be more pragmatic to write a intermediate C library doing exactly what you need and bind to that rather than bind directly to FreeType. Naturally, I'm not suggesting that you should agree with my analysis - but I would flag a caution that FreeType is very problematic to bind to. The abandoned code is in Copperbox: http://code.google.com/p/copperbox/source/checkout path in the trunk: libs/graphics/FreeType Best wishes Stephen