
22 Apr
2009
22 Apr
'09
10:24 a.m.
"Richard O'Keefe" et all wrote:
[n+k patterns]
I'd like to add my two cents: Assuming that UHC's roadmap strives to be H'-compilant in the future, and n+k patterns aren't going to be in H', why bother implementing them? Also, assuming that current H98 code will be ported to H', shouldn't n+k patterns be removed from existing code, anyway? -- (c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers for copyright history. All rights reserved. Copying, hiring, renting, performance and/or quoting of this signature prohibited.