
10 Apr
2012
10 Apr
'12
10:47 p.m.
Ben Lippmeier
I pushed Repa 3.1 to Hackage on the weekend. It has a *much* cleaner API. I can't recommend continuing to use Repa 2. You will just run into all the problems that are now fixed in Repa 3.
I was going to ask about the wiki page, and saw that you've posted a note there. Nice! Now only if someone would update it... :) http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Numeric_Haskell:_A_Repa_Tutorial Is the differences between Repa 2 and Repa 3 documented somewhere? I'm having trouble with running examples from the Repa paper... Thanks, Sajith. -- "the lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne." -- Chaucer.