
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:39:51 +0200, Jonathan Cast
On 30 Dec 2007, at 10:14 AM, Cristian Baboi wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 21:49:16 +0200, Jonathan Cast
wrote: On 29 Dec 2007, at 5:01 AM, Cristian Baboi wrote:
By portable I mean: works on the same machine, with the same OS, but with different Haskell implementation.
Ah, you can't. But, again, what are you trying to do? Re-compiling your software for each implementation seems like a perfectly reasonable thing to do, given the differences between them.
Recompiling my software will not save a function created by the software at runtime.
Which is a different problem than the one solved by dynamic linking. Again, why do you want to do this?
I think they are not as different as you think they are.