
24 Sep
2009
24 Sep
'09
3:10 p.m.
On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 19:48 +0100, Andy Gimblett wrote:
That's great news for me, except: that's what I tried first, and I've just tried it again and it still doesn't seem to work for me. Perhaps I am doing something wrong...?
You're quite right, it got broken with the move to haddock2. The code in Cabal-1.6 skips the pre-processing when using haddock2, assuming haddock will handle it. In the current Cabal development version it works properly and I get the right output for your example. Duncan