
8 Jul
2005
8 Jul
'05
5:10 p.m.
Henning Thielemann wrote:
does it not make sense to define matrix applicaion:
mapply :: Matrix -> Vector -> Vector
Then you can define say:
rotate90 = mapply rotationMatrix90
v' = rotate90 v
... that's what I said about mulVec.
I guess that means we agree... Keean.