On 11/13/16 6:05 AM, Saurabh Nanda wrote:
* Stackage & Hackage combine -- even the .cabal & .stack file formats (if possible)
Let's not conflate two things. I assume you're talking about stack.yaml as the ..stack file format. This should be a completely separate discussion for multiple reasons:
* That's about Stack vs cabal-install instead of Stackage vs Hackage * It's completely necessary to have package-level vs project-level configuration (even cabal-install has a separate project config format separate from the .cabal format)
I didn't realise that. Let me read more about the problems that stack is trying to solve vs those that cabal is trying to solve. To my untrained eye, they're solving very similar problems to exist as two separate projects. Isn't a package a kind of a project? Or vice-versa.
Here's what I wrote last time this was discussed: https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2016-September/124896.html which is pretty much what Snoyman said in his follow-up here. To me, stack is trying to solve the same problems as hsenv, as well as the same problems as cabal-install, as well as some problems that neither solves. And although there's overlap between cabal-install and stack, that's not the same as saying there's overlap between stack.yaml and .cabal files. --Patrick