13 Feb
2009
13 Feb
'09
10:45 a.m.
Robin Green wrote:
I think we can fairly safely discount the commercial relevance of any language ranking which places LOGO so highly.
It may be that a lot of people *know* LOGO (or claim to know it), but that does not mean that is used a lot for commercial programming.
If we discuss here about a new Haskell LOGO - does this also count as a hit for LOGO programming language?